I have a whole post about Atsromech Droids almost ready to go, but for now whet your whistle on this:
posted from GMAIL, w00t!
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
Dirty Rooms?
There is a file on one of our company servers called "LIST OF DIRTY ROOMS"
Which prompts me to ask: How dirty are they?
--
Posted from GMAIL, w00t!!
Which prompts me to ask: How dirty are they?
--
Posted from GMAIL, w00t!!
Friday, June 25, 2010
DRM is Incompatible With Modern Life (a short essay)
According to Wikipedia, DRM is defined as:
"Digital rights management (DRM) is a generic term for access control technologies that can be used by hardware manufacturers, publishers, copyright holders and individuals to impose limitations on the usage of digital content and devices."
PC Mag Encyclopedia defines as:
"(Digital Rights Management) A system for authorizing the viewing or playback of copyrighted material on a user's computer or digital music player."
Two very distinct views of what DRM is, and how it is used. The Wikipedia editors seem to have negative bias against it, since it's a way to 'impose limitations' (also noted on the current page: This article's Criticism or Controversy section(s) may mean the article does not present a neutral point of view). But really, if you do a search for DRM you will probably find more negative articles than positive ones. In fact, doing a quick Google search reveals a page of either definitions, articles on why its bad and why it should be abolished, or questions asking what it is in the first place. Not to mention about a thousand sites telling you how to REMOVE DRM.
So, going with the PC Mag version of the definition "A system for authorizing viewing or playback" we have to assume that its a GOOD thing Right? Since it's obviously all about LETTING you get to content, and listen to/view it legally. DRM authorizes use. Which must mean that it's nearly impossible for content creators and copyright holders to release material without it. Right?
Not so fast. (TV's) Wil Wheaton has a blog post here. Check it out real quick, and see why DRM is hampering a paying customer. I'll wait while you read his post and then his semi-short article for Techland with more details. Go ahead...
OK? Did you learn anything? Paying customer, trying to do the 'right' thing and pay for access to content (which is broadcast in the UK for free - pretty sure - , and which is later rebroadcast in the US on BBCA). He did everything right. BUT, since just about everything on iTunes is DRM'd [EDIT: I believe that the MP3s on iTunes are no longer DRM'd, but don't quote me, I buy full functional MP3s from AMAZON and other sites. plus i am decidedly NOT an Apple fanboy :) ](and pretty much incompatible with anything Microsoft {XBox})[EDIT 6/26 11:17am; Just realized that I actually WROTE that. It's not exactly true. Thankfully the interoperability problems of the last ~20years is eroding fast, mostly because of the cloud. The cloud doesn't care if you use Windows, MAC OS, Linux Flavors, Android, Palm's WEB OS, or a comodore64! Unfortunatly, DRM does care. Some will only let you view/use/listen to your purchased content on a single device, or any registered device.]. The limitations of DRM make it so that young Wil cannot enjoy his legally purchased content in the manner he wishes.
So, what possible USE is that to anyone? None. This is MY opinion, granted, but it seems as though these content creators are trying to create artificial scarcity in a market that is dominated by infinite goods. Make sense? maybe not right out of the box, but read a few articles at Techdirt and you'll soon see what i mean. The economics of entertainment, content, advertising, and really, all things digital, are changing. Most of the legacy companies in these areas are desperately hanging onto business models that are becoming increasingly obsolete.
The actual economics of the situation are probably an issue for a different day. Point being, DRM is a hindrance on the consumer. It is NOT an enabler, its a restriction. Punishing paying customers (like Wil) is not good business, and will just lead to more instances of piracy. DRM obviously doesn't work, since all kinds of people are 'pirating' the content Wil is trying to view anyway. Shouldn't the fact that he actually paid for it give him the ability to view it where/when/HOW he wants? No, he is restricted because he is a paying customer.
Another HUGE problem is the laws in the US. Basically, you are legally able to make personal copies of media (DVD, CD etc) for personal use. ie: Say you ride a train every day for 45 minutes to get to work, and you like to catch up on your TV shows or movies while you commute. You can legally rip a DVD to your laptop or iPod or whatever and watch the content on that device. Unfortunately, it is illegal to circumvent any kind of "technical protection measures" -as defined by the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act). Which means, if there is any kind of DRM or copy protection on the disc that you legally purchased, you cannot exercise your legal right to copy that disc in any way. Why is this? to prevent...
wait for it...
PIRACY!
So, does it work? Obviously not. Since DRM has been around for a LONG time, and people are illegally sharing files left right and center all over the world. But, it is pretty much impossible to get realistic 'piracy' stats.
The RIAA and MPAA have been putting out bogus and assumed statistics for years, claiming billions upon billions of lost dollars per year in illegal downloads of movies and music. So, part of the combined **AA's plan(s) to end piracy was to sue thousands of customers over the last few years, another part was 'education,' and yet a 3rd part has been DRM. Have any of these been successful? Well, that's in the eye of the beholder.
GOOD NEWS is, it looks like DRM may be going the way of the dodo.
Recent reports put DRM on a downward spiral that essentially began in the mainstream with Amazon's digital music download service which went DRM-free out of the gate (although it's video streaming service and Kindle devices are still crippled with DRM, even though it seems easy enough to illegally get around). Even Apple, which is notorious for being controlling, has managed to get it's iTunes music un-DRM'd.
now, if we can just get movies, TV and books to go down the same path... which is beginning in some sectors.
The future is a beautiful place!
"Digital rights management (DRM) is a generic term for access control technologies that can be used by hardware manufacturers, publishers, copyright holders and individuals to impose limitations on the usage of digital content and devices."
PC Mag Encyclopedia defines as:
"(Digital Rights Management) A system for authorizing the viewing or playback of copyrighted material on a user's computer or digital music player."
Two very distinct views of what DRM is, and how it is used. The Wikipedia editors seem to have negative bias against it, since it's a way to 'impose limitations' (also noted on the current page: This article's Criticism or Controversy section(s) may mean the article does not present a neutral point of view). But really, if you do a search for DRM you will probably find more negative articles than positive ones. In fact, doing a quick Google search reveals a page of either definitions, articles on why its bad and why it should be abolished, or questions asking what it is in the first place. Not to mention about a thousand sites telling you how to REMOVE DRM.
So, going with the PC Mag version of the definition "A system for authorizing viewing or playback" we have to assume that its a GOOD thing Right? Since it's obviously all about LETTING you get to content, and listen to/view it legally. DRM authorizes use. Which must mean that it's nearly impossible for content creators and copyright holders to release material without it. Right?
Not so fast. (TV's) Wil Wheaton has a blog post here. Check it out real quick, and see why DRM is hampering a paying customer. I'll wait while you read his post and then his semi-short article for Techland with more details. Go ahead...
OK? Did you learn anything? Paying customer, trying to do the 'right' thing and pay for access to content (which is broadcast in the UK for free - pretty sure - , and which is later rebroadcast in the US on BBCA). He did everything right. BUT, since just about everything on iTunes is DRM'd [EDIT: I believe that the MP3s on iTunes are no longer DRM'd, but don't quote me, I buy full functional MP3s from AMAZON and other sites. plus i am decidedly NOT an Apple fanboy :) ](and pretty much incompatible with anything Microsoft {XBox})[EDIT 6/26 11:17am; Just realized that I actually WROTE that. It's not exactly true. Thankfully the interoperability problems of the last ~20years is eroding fast, mostly because of the cloud. The cloud doesn't care if you use Windows, MAC OS, Linux Flavors, Android, Palm's WEB OS, or a comodore64! Unfortunatly, DRM does care. Some will only let you view/use/listen to your purchased content on a single device, or any registered device.]. The limitations of DRM make it so that young Wil cannot enjoy his legally purchased content in the manner he wishes.
So, what possible USE is that to anyone? None. This is MY opinion, granted, but it seems as though these content creators are trying to create artificial scarcity in a market that is dominated by infinite goods. Make sense? maybe not right out of the box, but read a few articles at Techdirt and you'll soon see what i mean. The economics of entertainment, content, advertising, and really, all things digital, are changing. Most of the legacy companies in these areas are desperately hanging onto business models that are becoming increasingly obsolete.
The actual economics of the situation are probably an issue for a different day. Point being, DRM is a hindrance on the consumer. It is NOT an enabler, its a restriction. Punishing paying customers (like Wil) is not good business, and will just lead to more instances of piracy. DRM obviously doesn't work, since all kinds of people are 'pirating' the content Wil is trying to view anyway. Shouldn't the fact that he actually paid for it give him the ability to view it where/when/HOW he wants? No, he is restricted because he is a paying customer.
Another HUGE problem is the laws in the US. Basically, you are legally able to make personal copies of media (DVD, CD etc) for personal use. ie: Say you ride a train every day for 45 minutes to get to work, and you like to catch up on your TV shows or movies while you commute. You can legally rip a DVD to your laptop or iPod or whatever and watch the content on that device. Unfortunately, it is illegal to circumvent any kind of "technical protection measures" -as defined by the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act). Which means, if there is any kind of DRM or copy protection on the disc that you legally purchased, you cannot exercise your legal right to copy that disc in any way. Why is this? to prevent...
wait for it...
PIRACY!
So, does it work? Obviously not. Since DRM has been around for a LONG time, and people are illegally sharing files left right and center all over the world. But, it is pretty much impossible to get realistic 'piracy' stats.
The RIAA and MPAA have been putting out bogus and assumed statistics for years, claiming billions upon billions of lost dollars per year in illegal downloads of movies and music. So, part of the combined **AA's plan(s) to end piracy was to sue thousands of customers over the last few years, another part was 'education,' and yet a 3rd part has been DRM. Have any of these been successful? Well, that's in the eye of the beholder.
GOOD NEWS is, it looks like DRM may be going the way of the dodo.
Recent reports put DRM on a downward spiral that essentially began in the mainstream with Amazon's digital music download service which went DRM-free out of the gate (although it's video streaming service and Kindle devices are still crippled with DRM, even though it seems easy enough to illegally get around). Even Apple, which is notorious for being controlling, has managed to get it's iTunes music un-DRM'd.
now, if we can just get movies, TV and books to go down the same path... which is beginning in some sectors.
The future is a beautiful place!
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Nerd Stuff (part 1)
Nerdcore roundup for this week (month?)
Trying to spend a little time each day Geeking out, usually to no avail. I spent maybe 45 minutes on the computer this week sorting through pictures and albums with Picasa for Linux the other night. Was interrupted by the wife, who couldn't sleep. And then the baby woke up to be fed, and I lost track and went to bed after wards. Noticed 2 days later that Picasa was still running (meaning that I hadn't been back to the PC in 2 days!).
Later in the week, I found a long enough VGA cable and strung it from the computer TARDIS [for some reason smaller on the inside] over to the TV. Problem is, the video card thinks that the VGA should be monitor 1 (0, sorry Linux-ites), and that DVI should be secondary. Who's brilliant fucking idea was that? In order to make the PC monitor PRIME, and TV Second I need to:
1) Find my DVI to VGA adapter
2) Attach said adapter to the VGA cable from the TV to the DVI out on the card
3) get yet another friggin VGA cable [from the garage] and
4) pull the DVI cable out of its route through the TARDIS and replace with VGA cable from #3.
[EDIT 6/23: DONE, wasn't nearly as involved as I made it out to be]
I'm lazy though so it could be a while.
I also figured out how to set up the wireless keyboard/mouse transceiver so that I can sit more than 4 feet from the TV. Haha! it's a little hard to surf the net from 12 feet away, even with a 37" monitor. But GAMES... are awesome :) Took a little searching through archived files, but I found "On the Rain Slick Precipice of Darkness, Episode I." Which i did not get to play... YET (this year)! perhaps by Wed or Thurs night I'll be able to stay up past the rest of the family's bed time.
But then I have 3 awesome choices for gaming: 1) OTRSPOD (thanks Penny Arcade!)
2) Red Steel 2 (on loan from that one Video Game rental-mail-out thing that's not in any way associated with Netflix)
3) D&D Online [which I haven't checked out on the BIG screen yet :( ]
So, I beat the PA game almost 2 years ago. RS2 is pretty awesome and involved, and D&D can be a little boring and INVOLVED (but still awesome).
There's so much else (or "so much other stuff" as my son would say) to do!! too much goddamn it! I have TV to watch (Friggin Leverage just started up again and my DVR is holding 2 episodes for me), movies, BOOKS and a bunch of other stuff. Grh.
lol,
So, with all of this NEW content bearing down on me, how did I spend my Father's Day off? on the couch, with the kids, watching Star Wars Episodes I-III. seriously. the 3 worst movies (OK not really) ever made. Although the lightsaber battles were awesome, and Yoda makes a better Gummy Bear than a Soldier, and I can't stop thinking "Why doesn't someone just bitch-slap Anakin and say 'quit yer whining!'" Yup, almost 12 hours of being savagely beaten by George Lucas. There are a couple of things that came up and that I will probably create a whole new post for (ie: Amidala escaping from Naboo put Sideous in a serious panty-crunch, but somehow played directly into his evil plans?)
OK, will update later. Right now need to get myself home and eat some SOUP.
--
"...There are man made objects on the moon,
put there by a member of a species that only
60 years before had just invented the airplane."
-Sheldon Cooper
"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet."
- William Gibson
Trying to spend a little time each day Geeking out, usually to no avail. I spent maybe 45 minutes on the computer this week sorting through pictures and albums with Picasa for Linux the other night. Was interrupted by the wife, who couldn't sleep. And then the baby woke up to be fed, and I lost track and went to bed after wards. Noticed 2 days later that Picasa was still running (meaning that I hadn't been back to the PC in 2 days!).
Later in the week, I found a long enough VGA cable and strung it from the computer TARDIS [for some reason smaller on the inside] over to the TV. Problem is, the video card thinks that the VGA should be monitor 1 (0, sorry Linux-ites), and that DVI should be secondary. Who's brilliant fucking idea was that? In order to make the PC monitor PRIME, and TV Second I need to:
1) Find my DVI to VGA adapter
2) Attach said adapter to the VGA cable from the TV to the DVI out on the card
3) get yet another friggin VGA cable [from the garage] and
4) pull the DVI cable out of its route through the TARDIS and replace with VGA cable from #3.
[EDIT 6/23: DONE, wasn't nearly as involved as I made it out to be]
I'm lazy though so it could be a while.
I also figured out how to set up the wireless keyboard/mouse transceiver so that I can sit more than 4 feet from the TV. Haha! it's a little hard to surf the net from 12 feet away, even with a 37" monitor. But GAMES... are awesome :) Took a little searching through archived files, but I found "On the Rain Slick Precipice of Darkness, Episode I." Which i did not get to play... YET (this year)! perhaps by Wed or Thurs night I'll be able to stay up past the rest of the family's bed time.
But then I have 3 awesome choices for gaming: 1) OTRSPOD (thanks Penny Arcade!)
2) Red Steel 2 (on loan from that one Video Game rental-mail-out thing that's not in any way associated with Netflix)
3) D&D Online [which I haven't checked out on the BIG screen yet :( ]
So, I beat the PA game almost 2 years ago. RS2 is pretty awesome and involved, and D&D can be a little boring and INVOLVED (but still awesome).
There's so much else (or "so much other stuff" as my son would say) to do!! too much goddamn it! I have TV to watch (Friggin Leverage just started up again and my DVR is holding 2 episodes for me), movies, BOOKS and a bunch of other stuff. Grh.
lol,
So, with all of this NEW content bearing down on me, how did I spend my Father's Day off? on the couch, with the kids, watching Star Wars Episodes I-III. seriously. the 3 worst movies (OK not really) ever made. Although the lightsaber battles were awesome, and Yoda makes a better Gummy Bear than a Soldier, and I can't stop thinking "Why doesn't someone just bitch-slap Anakin and say 'quit yer whining!'" Yup, almost 12 hours of being savagely beaten by George Lucas. There are a couple of things that came up and that I will probably create a whole new post for (ie: Amidala escaping from Naboo put Sideous in a serious panty-crunch, but somehow played directly into his evil plans?)
OK, will update later. Right now need to get myself home and eat some SOUP.
--
"...There are man made objects on the moon,
put there by a member of a species that only
60 years before had just invented the airplane."
-Sheldon Cooper
"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet."
- William Gibson
Unicorn: The Meat Missing from my Diet
Gotta go get me some Unicorn before they aren't allowed to sell it anymore.
@Thinkgeek Officially our best-ever cease and desist
Seriously folks, can we CEASE with the Cease and Desist letters now? If the National Pork Board has nothing better to do that start a Streisand Effect for... oh, i see...
Here's the plan guys:
1) Send ThinkGeek a C&D for using the line "Unicorn - the New White Meat" 2) by lunchtime it will be a HUGE internet phenomenon and
3) Get TON's of publicity just like Barbara Streisand that one time and
4) ?????
5) Profit!
I don't know. That's the only thing I can possibly come up with as to WHY the pork people would think there would be consumer confusion between Pork and Unicorns. they don't look the same, or TASTE the same (and the later doesn't exist).
What's REALLY awesome about this is the SPEED at which almost all nerd/geek sites INSTANTLY picked this up and how it flew across Twitter like a raging Pegasus (ooooh, Pegasus Burgers! nice,).
Can't put a price on publicity. CNN is a little slow and will probably have something on it next week :)
@Thinkgeek Officially our best-ever cease and desist
Seriously folks, can we CEASE with the Cease and Desist letters now? If the National Pork Board has nothing better to do that start a Streisand Effect for... oh, i see...
Here's the plan guys:
1) Send ThinkGeek a C&D for using the line "Unicorn - the New White Meat" 2) by lunchtime it will be a HUGE internet phenomenon and
3) Get TON's of publicity just like Barbara Streisand that one time and
4) ?????
5) Profit!
I don't know. That's the only thing I can possibly come up with as to WHY the pork people would think there would be consumer confusion between Pork and Unicorns. they don't look the same, or TASTE the same (and the later doesn't exist).
What's REALLY awesome about this is the SPEED at which almost all nerd/geek sites INSTANTLY picked this up and how it flew across Twitter like a raging Pegasus (ooooh, Pegasus Burgers! nice,).
Can't put a price on publicity. CNN is a little slow and will probably have something on it next week :)
Happy Birthday to the King, baby
I was unaware of this, but it's Bruce's birthday today. Hail to the King baby.
http://scifiwire.com/2010/06/four-labels-from-the-bruc.php
Sent from my G1, far from home.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
House of the STFU!!
Co-Worker: singing House of the Rising Sun
Me: annoyed, Who sings that song?
Co-Worker: The Animals
Me: LET THEM SING IT!
--
"...There are man made objects on the moon, put there by a member of a species that only 60 years before had just invented the airplane."
-Sheldon Cooper
The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
- William Gibson
Me: annoyed, Who sings that song?
Co-Worker: The Animals
Me: LET THEM SING IT!
--
"...There are man made objects on the moon, put there by a member of a species that only 60 years before had just invented the airplane."
-Sheldon Cooper
The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.
- William Gibson
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Bogus "Settlement" Attempts FAIL; Try New Tactics: Questionnaire To Incriminate Self!
ACS:Law (A law firm in the UK) has been sending out THOUSANDS of bogus 'pre-settlement' letters to people it believes infringed on the copyright of its clients. Some how they have managed to swindle over a million pounds from unsuspecting people in the UK, even though there is NO legal reason for anyone to either respond to or pay these 'fines.'
The practice is being cloned here in the US by a couple of different law firms. Please don't be taken in. Especially if you receive a questionnaire like this one. It's almost laughable how hard these guys are trying to scam money out of innocent people.
Let's be clear. These guys have absolutely NO proof that you downloaded anything illegally. There is no evidence of infringement on your part, or anyone else. The best thing to do is just ignore them, and they should just go away.
Torrent Freak has a great write up with a ton of links to try and educate people on this. I suggest everyone read it.
Thanks!
The practice is being cloned here in the US by a couple of different law firms. Please don't be taken in. Especially if you receive a questionnaire like this one. It's almost laughable how hard these guys are trying to scam money out of innocent people.
Let's be clear. These guys have absolutely NO proof that you downloaded anything illegally. There is no evidence of infringement on your part, or anyone else. The best thing to do is just ignore them, and they should just go away.
Torrent Freak has a great write up with a ton of links to try and educate people on this. I suggest everyone read it.
Thanks!
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
New Art - Same Old Style!
Now that my hands are back in operational order, almost at 100%... I'm working on some new art. These are some sketches I've been messing with the last couple of days. Let me know what you think, either in comments or email. Once I get going seriously there will be some awesome opportunities for prints and t-shirts!
On this post, you get ONE medium sized preview, and 3 small ones. However, i encourage you to click the pictures and view them full size.
Thanks, and may the Force be with you!
On this post, you get ONE medium sized preview, and 3 small ones. However, i encourage you to click the pictures and view them full size.
 |
| From Empty Lighter |
 |
| From Empty Lighter |
 |
| From Empty Lighter |
 |
| From Empty Lighter |
Thanks, and may the Force be with you!
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Watching TV
WOW, been a while huh? Haven't posted since... well, way before my illness. We'll get to that later. for now:
Watching TV is nearly impossible for me these days. At least regular TV, as in live, whenever executive pin-heads want you to. Which is OK, because I have DVR from my satellite TV provider. Not to mention Netflix on the Wii (AWESOME!) and streaming video on my PC. So, you would think that through all of the years I've had these services, I'd have started watching the following shows a LOT earlier:
...etc.
But no, for some reason I was not turned on to these shows until they had run at LEAST 3 years. What's up with that?? The problem lies with the solution. I'm almost constantly catching up on old shows. For example, I'm about halfway through Bones Season 1 through Netflix. Which means that by the time the current season ends, it's at least possible that I'll be caught up. We managed to get through 2 1/2 seasons of TBBT last month in time to pick up from S03E19 when it went 'live.' But again, not watching during the actual broadcast, DVR... :) good old DVR. Which could be a problem.
Apparently the TV ratings don't really look at DVR'd numbers, or downloads/streaming views. WHY??? everybody has been 'tivo-ing' for like 15 years. And before that there was VHS. The actual number of people who watch a show and become fans is FAR greater than what Nielsen would like us to believe. As evidenced by the Brown Coats. And all the folks who petitioned Fox to bring back Family Guy. My big fear is that shows like SGU will meet their end as quickly as Dollhouse and Firefly. (Which, really, got the crappy slots from Fox, and weren't really given a decent chance to survive.)
But I digress...
CSI is probably the only show I started watching midway through a season, and did NOT go back and watch from the Pilot (or Ep.1). Why? tooooo freaking long. If i can give up on Smallville after season 6, I can ignore 7 years of crime scenes.
The other side of the coin are shows like The Office. I haven't seen The Office in almost a year, and only watched on Hulu. Reason? Not really sure. I think i could snuggle it in on the DVR, some how. But I still need to go back MONTHS and pick up the story from Jim and Pam's wedding. At the moment, that's too much of a task. What with the kids, and being back at work. And the kicker is, I'm doing THAT to myself as well. Using up any free time to either watch the X# of movies I recorded 6 weeks back, or starting on all new shows. I COULD have caught up with Dwight and Angela starting in January when I got out of the Hospital. What did I do? lol, caught up on House and Leverage. Mostly, I set the TV on Food Network and just stare off into the ether as Bobby and Tyler grill and braise. Totally fascinated by Ultimate Recipe Showdown and Chopped.
So, to sum up. I'm lazy, and don't LOOK for new shows to watch, insist on time-shifting my entertainment, and LOVE catching up on 5 seasons at one time. Pretty sure the only reason I wrote this is because my wife asked me the other day, "WHY do you have to start liking all these shows after they've been on for 3 years??!?!" Oh, and i want to see if all these links I put in GMAIL show up on the blog post :)
--
Posted from GMAIL
Watching TV is nearly impossible for me these days. At least regular TV, as in live, whenever executive pin-heads want you to. Which is OK, because I have DVR from my satellite TV provider. Not to mention Netflix on the Wii (AWESOME!) and streaming video on my PC. So, you would think that through all of the years I've had these services, I'd have started watching the following shows a LOT earlier:
...etc.
But no, for some reason I was not turned on to these shows until they had run at LEAST 3 years. What's up with that?? The problem lies with the solution. I'm almost constantly catching up on old shows. For example, I'm about halfway through Bones Season 1 through Netflix. Which means that by the time the current season ends, it's at least possible that I'll be caught up. We managed to get through 2 1/2 seasons of TBBT last month in time to pick up from S03E19 when it went 'live.' But again, not watching during the actual broadcast, DVR... :) good old DVR. Which could be a problem.
Apparently the TV ratings don't really look at DVR'd numbers, or downloads/streaming views. WHY??? everybody has been 'tivo-ing' for like 15 years. And before that there was VHS. The actual number of people who watch a show and become fans is FAR greater than what Nielsen would like us to believe. As evidenced by the Brown Coats. And all the folks who petitioned Fox to bring back Family Guy. My big fear is that shows like SGU will meet their end as quickly as Dollhouse and Firefly. (Which, really, got the crappy slots from Fox, and weren't really given a decent chance to survive.)
But I digress...
CSI is probably the only show I started watching midway through a season, and did NOT go back and watch from the Pilot (or Ep.1). Why? tooooo freaking long. If i can give up on Smallville after season 6, I can ignore 7 years of crime scenes.
The other side of the coin are shows like The Office. I haven't seen The Office in almost a year, and only watched on Hulu. Reason? Not really sure. I think i could snuggle it in on the DVR, some how. But I still need to go back MONTHS and pick up the story from Jim and Pam's wedding. At the moment, that's too much of a task. What with the kids, and being back at work. And the kicker is, I'm doing THAT to myself as well. Using up any free time to either watch the X# of movies I recorded 6 weeks back, or starting on all new shows. I COULD have caught up with Dwight and Angela starting in January when I got out of the Hospital. What did I do? lol, caught up on House and Leverage. Mostly, I set the TV on Food Network and just stare off into the ether as Bobby and Tyler grill and braise. Totally fascinated by Ultimate Recipe Showdown and Chopped.
So, to sum up. I'm lazy, and don't LOOK for new shows to watch, insist on time-shifting my entertainment, and LOVE catching up on 5 seasons at one time. Pretty sure the only reason I wrote this is because my wife asked me the other day, "WHY do you have to start liking all these shows after they've been on for 3 years??!?!" Oh, and i want to see if all these links I put in GMAIL show up on the blog post :)
--
Posted from GMAIL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)